|
Post by methenas on May 11, 2018 12:03:11 GMT
Osasuna T_Graham 35 eng 2 28 10 7 24 298 694 891 126 A_Nouri 29 nor 1 26 11 6 21 600 743 917 607 R_Porteous 20 sco 1 21 7 6 32 600 521 890 780
Hearts S_Van_Doorn 36 hol 1 31 13 5 26 300 556 609 690 A_Van_Buuren 35 hol 2 30 12 8 25 300 737 499 310
Neither of Osasuna’s players are worth anything nor help Hearts to make a rebuild
Van Doorn could have been auctioned and raised more value for Hearts.
While Osasuna get two premier players to strengthen their side.
How could this be allowed? Nobody in their right mind would have done this deal.
|
|
|
Post by scottx3rd on May 11, 2018 12:06:53 GMT
Osasuna. Brand new manager. Awful deal.
I will contest it also.
Nothing will be done.
|
|
John
Youth Player
Everton
Posts: 468
|
Post by John on May 11, 2018 12:16:15 GMT
I contest also the vulture came back out on a new manager I see
|
|
|
Post by Malky(Admin) on May 11, 2018 12:19:48 GMT
Transfer deal now being reviewed by the transfer panel of three current managers
|
|
|
Post by tone on May 11, 2018 12:29:25 GMT
Shocking new manager raped again
|
|
|
Post by scottx3rd on May 11, 2018 14:15:42 GMT
Shocking new manager raped again I thought I was the only one who uses the rape word on here 😂😂😂
|
|
|
Post by gazza on May 11, 2018 15:57:28 GMT
Looks fine to me.
What's the fuss ?
|
|
|
Post by Dillon (OSA) on May 11, 2018 16:41:09 GMT
Osasuna T_Graham 35 eng 2 28 10 7 24 298 694 891 126 A_Nouri 29 nor 1 26 11 6 21 600 743 917 607 R_Porteous 20 sco 1 21 7 6 32 600 521 890 780 Hearts S_Van_Doorn 36 hol 1 31 13 5 26 300 556 609 690 A_Van_Buuren 35 hol 2 30 12 8 25 300 737 499 310 Neither of Osasuna’s players are worth anything nor help Hearts to make a rebuild Van Doorn could have been auctioned and raised more value for Hearts. While Osasuna get two premier players to strengthen their side. How could this be allowed? Nobody in their right mind would have done this deal. Nouri, a player that will be 30 years old and 27+ next season - a player that has another 6.75 seasons in the game. A player that would develop at Hearts whereas the likes of Doorn and Buuren both have a combined 2.5 seasons. This offsets the higher rating and is likely a valuable player to a Hearts manager looking to rebuild their team and steady the aging ship without dropping to ratings of 24/25. Graham allows for Hearts to maintain a stronger defence for this season despite in all likely events going down. Rather than lose 2 defenders for 1 this allows for Hearts to maintain their squad size for the same length as they would've had both defenders for a drop in ratings. Porteous will pad Hearts reserves until a point where he is likely 25 years old and 25 rated which by current standards would be a good squad player for Hearts and one if they persevere with that will do well in their team long term. Doorn and Buuren both are very limited in their use to Hearts who very likely will be relegated meaning they lose the entire value of Doorn. This season gives them a chance to build onto the abs of their team and use both Nouri and Graham next season where both are still available in Div1 to challenge for a playoff spot. This deal makes sense to both clubs and what they look for - why would I propose a deal that would be to my disadvantage however? Willing to revise the deal with the Hearts boss if he's unhappy with it but he's not a new boss having managed before in the game. He wouldn't have accepted the deal if he didn't think it was a good move for his club. Appreciate that this is a safety mechanism to stop clubs being absolutely ripped off, however think there are better ways to go about it than throwing around insults. Think it would be better if once contested the manager who offered the deal should give their justifying reasons as to why it should not be reversed, as above. A lot of deals look different to different managers for varying reasons - I put the offer forward in good faith thinking it was fair in my eyes however some others have felt different. As I said though, willing to revisit it if it is reversed. Would be good to hear from the Hearts boss though and see if he feels it should be reversed
|
|
|
Post by kaiserbilge on May 11, 2018 17:15:06 GMT
Tough one. Auction/ raise funds would have been my option, but the new boss has decided to get younger players in. Would have liked 5-10m on top.
|
|
|
Post by methenas on May 11, 2018 22:51:14 GMT
Osasuna T_Graham 35 eng 2 28 10 7 24 298 694 891 126 A_Nouri 29 nor 1 26 11 6 21 600 743 917 607 R_Porteous 20 sco 1 21 7 6 32 600 521 890 780 Hearts S_Van_Doorn 36 hol 1 31 13 5 26 300 556 609 690 A_Van_Buuren 35 hol 2 30 12 8 25 300 737 499 310 Neither of Osasuna’s players are worth anything nor help Hearts to make a rebuild Van Doorn could have been auctioned and raised more value for Hearts. While Osasuna get two premier players to strengthen their side. How could this be allowed? Nobody in their right mind would have done this deal. Nouri, a player that will be 30 years old and 27+ next season - a player that has another 6.75 seasons in the game. A player that would develop at Hearts whereas the likes of Doorn and Buuren both have a combined 2.5 seasons. This offsets the higher rating and is likely a valuable player to a Hearts manager looking to rebuild their team and steady the aging ship without dropping to ratings of 24/25. Graham allows for Hearts to maintain a stronger defence for this season despite in all likely events going down. Rather than lose 2 defenders for 1 this allows for Hearts to maintain their squad size for the same length as they would've had both defenders for a drop in ratings. Porteous will pad Hearts reserves until a point where he is likely 25 years old and 25 rated which by current standards would be a good squad player for Hearts and one if they persevere with that will do well in their team long term. Doorn and Buuren both are very limited in their use to Hearts who very likely will be relegated meaning they lose the entire value of Doorn. This season gives them a chance to build onto the abs of their team and use both Nouri and Graham next season where both are still available in Div1 to challenge for a playoff spot. This deal makes sense to both clubs and what they look for - why would I propose a deal that would be to my disadvantage however? Willing to revise the deal with the Hearts boss if he's unhappy with it but he's not a new boss having managed before in the game. He wouldn't have accepted the deal if he didn't think it was a good move for his club. Appreciate that this is a safety mechanism to stop clubs being absolutely ripped off, however think there are better ways to go about it than throwing around insults. Think it would be better if once contested the manager who offered the deal should give their justifying reasons as to why it should not be reversed, as above. A lot of deals look different to different managers for varying reasons - I put the offer forward in good faith thinking it was fair in my eyes however some others have felt different. As I said though, willing to revisit it if it is reversed. Would be good to hear from the Hearts boss though and see if he feels it should be reversed Dillon of course you would say wonders about this deal, how in hell would you say anything against your own deal where you are getting greatly benefited. And if Hearts Manager saw how much ripped off he was being he wouldn't have accepted it. That's why there is this thread and why we have the chance to contest deals....
|
|
|
Post by Malky(Admin) on May 12, 2018 6:13:35 GMT
Transfer deal overturned and players returned, all three transfer panel members ruled the deal one-sided
|
|