|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 5, 2009 7:46:42 GMT
S_Battaglia 30 arg 3 19 6 8 44 600 467 852 728
R_Knight 24 eng 1 2 19 1 31 300 541 483 558
C_Pallister 22 eng 1 4 4 19 32 300 892 677 374
O_Hargreaves 26 eng 2 2 20 4 31 300 233 760 595
F_Zbrozek 22 rsa 1 5 3 20 29 300 970 582 63
any kind of offers
|
|
|
|
Post by smeagol on Sept 5, 2009 8:48:03 GMT
hargreaves and zbrozak 8 million for the pair
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 5, 2009 10:25:04 GMT
hargreaves and zbrozak 8 million for the pair no thanks |
|
|
|
Post by tone on Sept 5, 2009 10:32:34 GMT
S_Battaglia 30 arg 3 19 6 8 44 600 467 852 728 R_Knight 24 eng 1 2 19 1 31 300 541 483 558 C_Pallister 22 eng 1 4 4 19 32 300 892 677 374 O_Hargreaves 26 eng 2 2 20 4 31 300 233 760 595 F_Zbrozek 22 rsa 1 5 3 20 29 300 970 582 63 any kind of offers[/color] give the lad a clue as to what you want as you asked for any kind of offers |
|
|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 5, 2009 11:01:41 GMT
its not about clues i paid a lot more than that for hargrieves alone last season,why should i name a price when no one else does
and defo not on the forum
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 5, 2009 11:04:25 GMT
also he never asked what i wanted he bidded i said no
|
|
|
|
Post by tone on Sept 5, 2009 11:06:11 GMT
also he never asked what i wanted he bidded i said no fair enough |
|
|
|
Post by scott on Sept 5, 2009 17:22:01 GMT
its not about clues i paid a lot more than that for hargrieves alone last season cos ur a mug |
|
|
|
Post by garfy on Sept 5, 2009 17:56:24 GMT
In EFL a simlple formula can be applied:
IF AGE > 26 AND SKILL <= 20 THEN = WORTHLESS
I have discovered this, lets call it Garfsteins Theory of RealTransferFee.
I have two strikers 20 skill under 25 that NO ONE has offered on, so £4m for your two is very fair and current market rates.
If anyone wants one for £4m then please see my thread ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 5, 2009 18:07:40 GMT
yh fair point dont mean ill sell for that though
|
|
|
|
Post by garfy on Sept 5, 2009 18:11:31 GMT
Quite right too . . . . Odd though aint it that a 22 year old is worth more than a 26 year old?
Realistically you wont have either in your roster in 4 seasons time, so kinda irrelevant really.
I think we should trade cows, beans and camels rather than cash, worked well for generations you know?!
|
|
|
|
Post by trulskaare on Sept 6, 2009 3:59:17 GMT
To be honest, there are teams out there who don't have 20 and above rated players accross the board. A value is only determined once a team decides to sell to another team at a certain price, so let's not get into an argument about trivial things.
|
|
|
|
Post by trulskaare on Sept 6, 2009 4:01:29 GMT
Aston Villa would surely be happy to pay more than eight million for the pair...
|
|
|
|
Post by Lee (Marseille) on Sept 6, 2009 7:13:43 GMT
To be honest, there are teams out there who don't have 20 and above rated players accross the board. A value is only determined once a team decides to sell to another team at a certain price, so let's not get into an argument about trivial things. i agree,theese players are not trash they have plenty of seasons and would fit into a lot of squads or would be good back ups for most teams |
|
|
|
Post by garfy on Sept 6, 2009 7:45:24 GMT
Ah yes, you are both quite right, and have in fact opened the age old dilemma of equal distribution. The better teams/managers are normally the most active, the most active snap up deals quicker, earn more money from game success or newspaper articles and this is then a self perpepuating cycle. Our problem is to equally distribute the players the more active players need to show a little patience, hold out for the right money (as Lee is) and when the teams who "value" the 20 skill forwards are in a position to make the offer, accept it. In short PI = Ni Si tue T  |
|
