|
Post by tone on Jun 12, 2015 19:20:16 GMT
Someone need to get facts right before spouting s**t scott. This season alone we have made 2 deals which doesnt include the loan. And i think last season was roughly the same. Simple fact is you have an issue with us. If you look through transfers you will see little clicks who have made more deals but nothing said. When my son played for a couple of seasons didnt make one deal as was told i carnt by malky. Until he stops us from making deals. Kiss my a
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 12, 2015 19:58:18 GMT
Of cooouuurrrse it wouldn't include the loan. Why would you include the loan? I mean, that isn't a common occurrence is it between you both :0 And of course we should ignore the loans you both make next season too, because, well, because you say so I don't have an issue with anyone Tone its just a game, if youre happy playing the game as a feeder team that's absolutely fine.
|
|
|
Post by tone on Jun 13, 2015 5:57:10 GMT
You also state that am's have no impact. All i can say is check my reserves and my league position it speeks for itself
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 13, 2015 7:07:43 GMT
Youre reserves are actually doing really well.
Maybe you should promote them?
|
|
|
Post by winzor @ Porto on Jun 13, 2015 8:02:52 GMT
your view on AM's is that of a fucktard. your more likely to score goals from more shooting stats in the team, regardless of who actually gets put down as the scorer.
Gosh, that's jolly rude.
I am yet to see any evidence that what you state makes any difference. What I do see evidence of though, is higher rated middies getting more assists.
what proof do you want? according to your view defenders should never be scoring goals, specially the ones with like 5 shooting. yet they do, not sure how the engine works it all out but it defo has a random factor on who gets the goals. But it does have more going to strikers, some kind of % thing I guess. the tactics table does not lie....... every stat is used with some tactics making more use of the second/third stats at the cost of main stat.
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 13, 2015 8:32:48 GMT
any proof would be a start...
|
|
|
Post by trulskaare on Jun 13, 2015 8:53:15 GMT
A:DF [1.00, 0.50, 0.50] A:DM [0.50, 0.90, 0.50] A:MF [0.00, 1.00, 0.75] A:AM [0.00, 0.90, 1.15] A:FW [0.00, 0.65, 1.50]
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 13, 2015 10:04:11 GMT
Bryn id say its pretty fair that not a single person knows what those numbers actually mean.
I have seen such wide interpretations that its far from proof that they mean anything at all.
|
|
|
Post by trulskaare on Jun 13, 2015 10:58:05 GMT
I thought it was quite straight forward. 1.00 means 100% of the players skill. 0.50 would mean the skill is half and so on. So in this example, when playing attacking with an AM, that player would have 90% of their passing skill applied to the total skill for passing, but also he'd add 115% of his shooting skill to the total shooting.
Let's say his skills were 20 for passing and 10 for shooting, his actual skills when playing A with him in the AM position would be 18 for passing and 11.5 for shooting. The 18 would be added to all the other passing skills, and the 11.5 would be added to the total shooting for the team.
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 13, 2015 13:10:34 GMT
I agree with the first paragraph, well, that's what my interpretation is.
The second part is where nobody really seems to know if for example all shooting is added for the entire team then somehow divided between the players or if they act as individual players throughout the game.
|
|
|
Post by winzor @ Porto on Jun 13, 2015 17:10:04 GMT
how is the 1st and 2nd paragraph any different? the second is just saying the same but with the skills used as an example lol
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 14, 2015 7:22:01 GMT
how is the 1st and 2nd paragraph any different? the second is just saying the same but with the skills used as an example lol Before you try and ridicule, maybe you should learn to read.
1st paragraph - discusses what the tactics table does % wise onto the stats of each player.
2nd paragraph - discusses if the stats are added to the "total team", that's the key word you may have missed in your haste to be smart.
|
|
|
Post by winzor @ Porto on Jun 14, 2015 9:07:34 GMT
I thought it was quite straight forward. 1.00 means 100% of the players skill. 0.50 would mean the skill is half and so on. So in this example, when playing attacking with an AM, that player would have 90% of their passing skill applied to the total skill for passing, but also he'd add 115% of his shooting skill to the total shooting.Let's say his skills were 20 for passing and 10 for shooting, his actual skills when playing A with him in the AM position would be 18 for passing and 11.5 for shooting. The 18 would be added to all the other passing skills, and the 11.5 would be added to the total shooting for the team. hmmm, who needs to learn to read?
|
|
|
Post by scott777 on Jun 14, 2015 11:08:42 GMT
I thought it was quite straight forward. 1.00 means 100% of the players skill. 0.50 would mean the skill is half and so on. So in this example, when playing attacking with an AM, that player would have 90% of their passing skill applied to the total skill for passing, but also he'd add 115% of his shooting skill to the total shooting.Let's say his skills were 20 for passing and 10 for shooting, his actual skills when playing A with him in the AM position would be 18 for passing and 11.5 for shooting. The 18 would be added to all the other passing skills, and the 11.5 would be added to the total shooting for the team. hmmm, who needs to learn to read?
Erm.. you... as that wasn't my post...
|
|
|
Post by winzor @ Porto on Jun 14, 2015 14:40:48 GMT
hmmm, who needs to learn to read?
Erm.. you... as that wasn't my post...
are you seriously that much of a fucktard? it is the post we were talking about. just proof you chat shite though I suppose
|
|