Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2016 22:25:47 GMT
I contest the following deal
21 Nov Valencia Sansao 33 ger 1 8 8 26 23 300 415 851 393 Osvaldo 30 bra 1 3 8 24 11 800 882 58 866
Manchester Utd Van_Tijkaan 29 hol 1 8 8 26 22 300 953 226 161
Here is why...
22 Nov Released player Gerd_Muller 31 ger 2 7 6 24 27 300 828 893 556 Valencia 0.39M
I contest this deal because, for starters, it doesn't make sense. Why would Derek swap a 19yr old for a 33yr old just to get an old 24 rater he could have bid on auction for 0.4mil?
It defies absolutely all logic, and regardless of him being a long standing manager, I feel it is absolutely unfair to the Div 2 club.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2016 22:28:33 GMT
And I would like to add, the other fwd is now his 5th best striker, adding yet more ridiculousness to the transfer.
|
|
|
Post by Dillon (OSA) on Nov 22, 2016 23:01:12 GMT
I contest the following deal
21 Nov Valencia Sansao 33 ger 1 8 8 26 23 300 415 851 393 Osvaldo 30 bra 1 3 8 24 11 800 882 58 866
Manchester Utd Van_Tijkaan 29 hol 1 8 8 26 22 300 953 226 161
Here is why...
22 Nov Released player Gerd_Muller 31 ger 2 7 6 24 27 300 828 893 556 Valencia 0.39M
I contest this deal because, for starters, it doesn't make sense. Why would Derek swap a 19yr old for a 33yr old just to get an old 24 rater he could have bid on auction for 0.4mil?
It defies absolutely all logic, and regardless of him being a long standing manager, I feel it is absolutely unfair to the Div 2 club.
+1
|
|
|
Post by Malky(Admin) on Nov 23, 2016 6:08:31 GMT
Sorry I'm not getting this Van_Tijkaan is 29 years old not 19?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2016 8:48:02 GMT
Yes, and the player he swapped is 4 years older.
Why swap for a player he could've bought on a free?
Doesnt add up.
Take the best player in your squad, would you swap him for a player 4 years older and 400k/a 5th choice forward you will never play?
Nope.
|
|
|
Post by tone on Nov 23, 2016 8:53:51 GMT
Best way scott is to put a pole on any deal if you get 3 managers contesting the deal then it will have to be sorted. Saves it going around and around on thread
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2016 10:19:16 GMT
Best way scott is to put a pole on any deal if you get 3 managers contesting the deal then it will have to be sorted. Saves it going around and around on thread Problem then is people may click yes under fake profiles if they disliked a manager. Id rather if people disagree with a deal they at least explain why. This deal my be fine to others, but for me, he couldve signed that player for 400k, why sell his best player and lose 4 years instead?
|
|
|
Post by pezza @ Marseille on Nov 23, 2016 13:37:26 GMT
Man united will accept any deal put in front of them, simple as that
|
|
|
Post by andieglen on Nov 23, 2016 14:56:06 GMT
Makes no difference what a player is bought for its about the deal it self.
If you ignore the loan they have, those players are his 1St and 2nd choice not the 5th, come EOS he looses 2 forwards anyway so now has cover.
It's a simple 2 for 1 swap
Not sure why I am even explaining it TBH
|
|
|
Post by johnraggett on Nov 24, 2016 23:40:16 GMT
Pezza is that a contest, if so that's the 3 needed?
|
|
|
Post by johnraggett on Nov 24, 2016 23:41:01 GMT
It's not a 2 for 1 though Andie, it's a swap deal plus a pointless token gesture
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2016 9:06:45 GMT
Makes no difference what a player is bought for its about the deal it self. If you ignore the loan they have, those players are his 1St and 2nd choice not the 5th, come EOS he looses 2 forwards anyway so now has cover. It's a simple 2 for 1 swap Not sure why I am even explaining it TBH Ok andie let me make an offer for the best player of yours, mine will be a player the same stat but 4 years older, along with a player that you couod buy on the auction market right now for 400k. Ridiculous that he made that deal as its clear something doesnt add up.
|
|
theo
1st Team Regular
Benfica
Posts: 741
|
Post by theo on Nov 25, 2016 13:03:21 GMT
I agree this one is very one sided, doesn't make sense
|
|
|
Post by andieglen on Nov 25, 2016 23:17:18 GMT
Makes no difference what a player is bought for its about the deal it self. If you ignore the loan they have, those players are his 1St and 2nd choice not the 5th, come EOS he looses 2 forwards anyway so now has cover. It's a simple 2 for 1 swap Not sure why I am even explaining it TBH Ok andie let me make an offer for the best player of yours, mine will be a player the same stat but 4 years older, along with a player that you couod buy on the auction market right now for 400k. Ridiculous that he made that deal as its clear something doesnt add up. ha ha ha really my best player is 31/32 rated you offered a guy nearly 6 skill points lower and offered cash to sweeten the deal which worked out to be 3 mil per point, i offered a player (slightly better) and a 24/25 rated one for good measure, to sweeten the deal. same thing in my book, different players, different values, different managers, different leagues and different teams. my cannon fodder becomes his 1st and second best choice, i get a younger cannon fodder. but in relation a 32 rated to a 26 rated one has a massive cash exchange IMO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2016 11:33:42 GMT
Andie the facts are.
He sold his best player for one the same but 4 years older and a player he couldve bought via auction at that very time for 400k.
It doesn't add up.
It isnt a dig at you.
We cant keep moaning about deals if we arent going to question all deals that make no sense.
|
|