|
Post by johnraggett on Sept 13, 2013 6:59:46 GMT
Interesting few additions to this list, certainly gonna make me think about my set up more and can see why the N tactic is ever so powerful, can see me using it more with this new information!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2013 21:48:41 GMT
It's a bit of an idiots guide to tactics if you ask me, but when wrote out in full makes a really good read TBH If you can hit your bonuses then the world is a good un" (in theory)
Best part about it is:
This bit.
NvsE:DF [1.00, 0.50, 0.30] NvsE:DM [0.90, 0.87, 0.30] NvsE:MF [0.55, 1.00, 0.55] NvsE:AM [0.30, 1.00, 0.90] NvsE:FW [0.30, 0.55, 1.00]
NvsA:DF [1.00, 0.50, 0.30] NvsA:DM [0.90, 0.87, 0.30] NvsA:MF [0.55, 1.00, 0.55] NvsA:AM [0.30, 1.00, 0.90] NvsA:FW [0.30, 0.55, 1.00]
N never had a bonus before? Looks like A and E will struggle(lmao) definitely could cause problems? A bit like a Friday nite lol. Steve would turn in his grave knowing this LMAO
T looks handy I'm assuming without the reduction?? (which is wrong)
L's the surprise package here for me!
Looks like no one will be playing a Barca way? P sucks? So does E so many flaws!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2013 21:50:51 GMT
Who makes this sh1t up??
|
|
|
Post by johnraggett on Oct 1, 2013 13:48:30 GMT
Why do you say E is so bad?
Not totted up what all the extras equal yet, had them all written down on the old engine.
N didn't have any bonus on the old engine, right Malky? Or did we just not know about it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2013 21:04:48 GMT
Because it's all geared up for triple/double stated players, just compare the core value of each tactic to their bonuses and you will see that a few of them hand out bonuses to secondary skills!
A boosts attack E boosts passing D boosts tackling
After that, all other bonuses are to DM'S, AM'S and secondaries! (now you know why Tony has done well)
For the record C works even better than P against T, but we never know when we play against T, which we should?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2013 21:16:01 GMT
E is shit because even the bonuses don't change core values, unless you have a fair few defenders with good passing a DM, AM and Forward with at least 10/20 secondaries then no point really! What you gain in the passing department is lost in defensive duties!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2013 21:21:00 GMT
Oh wait Barca, Real, Porto, Valencia and Rangers have those HIGH double stated players??
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm!
|
|
|
Post by bigdan on Oct 2, 2013 6:57:50 GMT
For the record C works even better than P against T, but we never know when we play against T, which we should? According to the new system, Malky doesn't play T any more. Invalid teamsheet results in 442N and no abs gain. (Oops, 442N suddenly looks like a better prospect!) (btw - I couldn't work out if you were serious about Tony being successful or not?)
|
|